
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/books/22library.html
According to eschoolnews.com, school librarians are working at improving the standards for learning this fall. The American Association of School Librarians (AASL) has released a set of “Standards for the 21st Century Learner.” These new standards seek to take account of the changes in the present student's learning environment.
In light of the challenges presented by budget cuts, the “Standards for the 21st Century Learner” focus on the learning process itself. These standards, while applicable to every century, deal with tendencies that are particularly associated with the technologies of the present era.
To overcome the passive or plagiaristic tendencies of television and the Internet, the AASL is seeking to implement an inquiry-based process for learning, emphasizing creativity and encouraging critical thinking at an earlier age.
These skills are necessary for any generation, but in our Information Age, there is a real temptation to let the technology do the thinking for us. School librarians recognize the help and the harm technology presents and are seeking to educate students accordingly.
Good Riddance.
As the publishing industry wobbles and Kindle sales jump, book romanticists cry themselves to sleep. But really, what are we shedding tears over?
We’re losing the throwaway paperback.
The airport paperback.
The beachside paperback.
We’re losing the dregs of the publishing world: disposable books. The book printed without consideration of form or sustainability or longevity. The book produced to be consumed once and then tossed. The book you bin when you’re moving and you need to clean out the closet.
These are the first books to go. And I say it again, good riddance.
Once we dump this weight we can prune our increasingly obsolete network of distribution. As physicality disappears, so too does the need to fly dead trees around the world.
You already know the potential gains: edgier, riskier books in digital form, born from a lower barrier-to-entry to publish. New modes of storytelling. Less environmental impact. A rise in importance of editors. And, yes — paradoxically — a marked increase in the quality of things that do get printed.
From 2003-2009 I spent six years trying to make beautiful printed books. Six years. Focused on printed books. In the 00s.
And I loved it. I loved the process. The finality of the end product. I loved the sexy-as-hell tactility of those little ink and paper bricks. But I can tell you this: the excitement I feel about the iPad as a content creator, designer and publisher — and the potential it brings — must be acknowledged. Acknowledged bluntly and with perspective.
With the iPad we finally have a platform for consuming rich-content in digital form. What does that mean? To understand just why the iPad is so exciting we need to think about how we got here.
I want to look at where printed books stand in respect to digital publishing, why we historically haven't read long-form text on screens and how the iPad is wedging itself in the middle of everything. In doing so I think we can find the line in the sand to define when content should be printed or digitized.
This is a conversation for books-makers, web-heads, content-creators, authors and designers. For people who love beautifully made things. And for the storytellers who are willing to take risks and want to consider the most appropriate shape and media for their yarns.
For the rest see: http://craigmod.com/journal/ipad_and_books/
(CNN) -- He never told a lie, as the story goes. So maybe if he were alive today, President George Washington could tell a New York City library what he did with two books he checked out 221 years ago.
The two books -- weighty discourses on international relations and parliamentary debates -- were checked out on October 5, 1789.
They were due on November 2, 1789, but weren't brought back.
Since then, they've been steadily collecting a fine of a few cents each day, adding up to more than $4,000 by the New York Society Library's informal estimate.
"I'm sorry, math is not my thing at all," said Jane Goldstein, the assistant head librarian when asked to hazard a guess.
The fine at the time was 2 pence a day. Now, it's 15 cents -- "It's really gone up, hasn't it?" she quipped.
One of the librarians, Matthew Haugen, guessed the fine to be in the region of 3,000 British pounds, or about $4,577.
"He stuck with the pence concept," Goldstein said.
The library first learned of the missing books when it discovered a yellowed ledger in its basement
It listed all the people who had checked out books from the city's oldest library between July 1789 and April 1792.
Next to the works "Law of Nations" and the 12th volume of "Common Debates" was the name of the person who checked them out: "President."
At the time, New York was the capital of the United States, and the library was the only one in town.
Soon after, the capital was relocated to Philadelphia and then Washington D.C.
The New York library, a subscription library that was New York's first library open to the public, has known about the missing books since the 1930s. The matter came up again recently because the library is capturing the ledgers in digital form to preserve the records.
Library officials cross-checked the books mentioned in the ledger with the ones in their collection.
"Volume 12 (of "Common Debates") was still missing," as was the other book, Goldstein said.
The library is not so concerned about the fine as it is about each book.
"We don't know where it is," she said. "We have tried to find it and we can't," she said.
The Athenaeum Music & Arts Library, located in the heart of La Jolla, has an impressive collection of books, periodicals, reference material in their archives along with thousands of compact discs, cassettes, videotapes, DVDs, and sheet music.
The library holds one of the largest collections of artists' books in Southern California. Their collection contains many beautiful books on the subject of music and art written for young children. They regularly have exhibitions of their art collections and their art galleries are open to the public five days a week. Members of the non-profit can check out materials for a modest annual fee.
Their website:
http://www.ljathenaeum.org/home.html
A list of their recent acquisitions:
http://www.ljathenaeum.org/recentacquisitions.html
Their online catalog:
http://207.67.203.76/A94011Staff/OPAC/index.asp
Current Exhibitions:
http://www.ljathenaeum.org/exhibitions.html#current
Research Library of the San Diego Genealogical Society
The SDGS Library's genealogical research collection consists of more than 9,200 titles. Many are multi-volume sets. The library holds more than 1,000 periodical titles. The extensive collection of the San Diego Genealogical Society Library is one of the major genealogical resources in San Diego. Housed in approximately 2200 square feet, the SDGS Library is located at 7343 Ronson Road in Kearny Mesa.
The library is accessible to members 24 hours a day, 365 days per year, and and open to the public on Thursdays from 10 a.m. until 3 p.m. Computers with high speed internet are available for use to everyone.
Interesting fact: The library uses the Dewey system!
Their website
http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~casdgs/library.shtml
Their online catalog
http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~casdgs/librarycatalog.shtml
A rare copy of Jane Austen’s “Emma,” signed by the author, has sold for almost $500,000, according to the BBC News. This three-volume first edition, below, published in 1816, was one of 12 presentation copies that the publisher, John Murray, allotted to Austen for friends and family. Austen originally gave this copy to Anne Sharp, her friend and the inspiration for the character of Mrs. Weston in the novel. In 2008 Jonkers Rare Books in Henley-on-Thames, England, bought the book for a little more than $273,000 at the Bonhams auction house in London. Last week Jonkers announced that it had sold the book to a British collector it did not identify. “The important thing is the signature of Jane Austen to her best friend,” Christiaan Jonkers, director of the booksellers, told The Henley Standard. “That’s what moves it from being a £20,000 book to a £300,000 book.”
As printed in The New York Times
Compiled by RACHEL LEE HARRIS
Published: April 4, 2010