
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/books/22library.html
As a side note .. I found this interesting news article about an upset patron over library weeding. All the comments after the article from librarians are the best part

According to eschoolnews.com, school librarians are working at improving the standards for learning this fall. The American Association of School Librarians (AASL) has released a set of “Standards for the 21st Century Learner.” These new standards seek to take account of the changes in the present student's learning environment.
In light of the challenges presented by budget cuts, the “Standards for the 21st Century Learner” focus on the learning process itself. These standards, while applicable to every century, deal with tendencies that are particularly associated with the technologies of the present era.
To overcome the passive or plagiaristic tendencies of television and the Internet, the AASL is seeking to implement an inquiry-based process for learning, emphasizing creativity and encouraging critical thinking at an earlier age.
These skills are necessary for any generation, but in our Information Age, there is a real temptation to let the technology do the thinking for us. School librarians recognize the help and the harm technology presents and are seeking to educate students accordingly.
Good Riddance.
As the publishing industry wobbles and Kindle sales jump, book romanticists cry themselves to sleep. But really, what are we shedding tears over?
We’re losing the throwaway paperback.
The airport paperback.
The beachside paperback.
We’re losing the dregs of the publishing world: disposable books. The book printed without consideration of form or sustainability or longevity. The book produced to be consumed once and then tossed. The book you bin when you’re moving and you need to clean out the closet.
These are the first books to go. And I say it again, good riddance.
Once we dump this weight we can prune our increasingly obsolete network of distribution. As physicality disappears, so too does the need to fly dead trees around the world.
You already know the potential gains: edgier, riskier books in digital form, born from a lower barrier-to-entry to publish. New modes of storytelling. Less environmental impact. A rise in importance of editors. And, yes — paradoxically — a marked increase in the quality of things that do get printed.
From 2003-2009 I spent six years trying to make beautiful printed books. Six years. Focused on printed books. In the 00s.
And I loved it. I loved the process. The finality of the end product. I loved the sexy-as-hell tactility of those little ink and paper bricks. But I can tell you this: the excitement I feel about the iPad as a content creator, designer and publisher — and the potential it brings — must be acknowledged. Acknowledged bluntly and with perspective.
With the iPad we finally have a platform for consuming rich-content in digital form. What does that mean? To understand just why the iPad is so exciting we need to think about how we got here.
I want to look at where printed books stand in respect to digital publishing, why we historically haven't read long-form text on screens and how the iPad is wedging itself in the middle of everything. In doing so I think we can find the line in the sand to define when content should be printed or digitized.
This is a conversation for books-makers, web-heads, content-creators, authors and designers. For people who love beautifully made things. And for the storytellers who are willing to take risks and want to consider the most appropriate shape and media for their yarns.
For the rest see: http://craigmod.com/journal/ipad_and_books/

